MySQL查詢列必須和group by欄位一致嗎?
- 2021 年 12 月 23 日
- 筆記
@
MySQL版本:8.0.27
場景:查詢各部門薪水最高的員工。
CREATE TABLE `employee` (
`id` int NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT COMMENT '主鍵ID',
`dept` int NOT NULL COMMENT '部門',
`user` varchar(32) CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_general_ci NOT NULL COMMENT '員工',
`salary` int NULL DEFAULT NULL COMMENT '薪水',
`is_deleted` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT 0 COMMENT '是否刪除',
`remark` varchar(512) CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_general_ci NULL DEFAULT NULL COMMENT '備註',
`modify_time` datetime(3) NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP(3) ON UPDATE CURRENT_TIMESTAMP(3) COMMENT '修改時間',
PRIMARY KEY (`id`) USING BTREE
) ENGINE = InnoDB CHARACTER SET = utf8 COLLATE = utf8_general_ci COMMENT = '員工' ROW_FORMAT = Dynamic;
INSERT INTO `employee` VALUES (1, 1, '張三', 1000, 0, NULL, '2021-12-23 09:20:19.606');
INSERT INTO `employee` VALUES (2, 1, '李四', 1500, 0, NULL, '2021-12-23 09:20:21.679');
INSERT INTO `employee` VALUES (3, 1, '王五', 2000, 0, NULL, '2021-12-23 09:20:23.371');
INSERT INTO `employee` VALUES (4, 2, '趙六', 1000, 0, NULL, '2021-12-23 09:21:59.373');
INSERT INTO `employee` VALUES (5, 2, '孫七', 1500, 0, NULL, '2021-12-23 09:22:15.000');
SELECT * FROM employee;

方法一:
SELECT
t1.*
FROM
employee t1
LEFT JOIN employee t2 ON t2.dept = t1.dept AND t1.salary < t2.salary
WHERE
t2.salary IS NULL;

方法二:
SELECT
*
FROM
( SELECT * FROM `employee` ORDER BY dept, salary DESC LIMIT 1000 ) t
GROUP BY
dept;
(不加limit可能會失效)

看起來結果是一樣的,但第二種其實會有問題的。
MySQL group by是如何決定哪一條數據留下的?
MySQL通過sql_mode來提供SQL語句的合法性檢查,
在默認情況下,MySQL允許查詢列target list中出現除了group by column、聚集函數等以外的表達式。
但是,那些不參與group by的欄位具體會返回哪條數據的值在MySQL中是處於未定義規則的狀態,
MySQL不承諾一定會返回哪條數據。
分組前的數據:
SELECT * FROM employee ORDER BY dept, salary DESC LIMIT 1000;

看起來方法二返回的是每個分組中的第一條的數據,
但實際上還會與存儲引擎、物理位置、索引等有關,
如果是InnoDB的話,取決於在B+Tree上命中的第一條索引,
這裡不展開說明,畢竟不是安全的用法,
有的時候可能返回的結果並不是我們想要的。
關於B+Tree,可以看下這篇文章:
通過B+Tree平衡多叉樹理解InnoDB引擎的聚集和非聚集索引
所以對於target list中出現的不明確的列,MySQL是不確定哪一條數據留下的。
對於語法限制比較嚴格的資料庫,都不支援target list中出現語義不明確的列,
MySQL中提供了一個修正的sql_mode,ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY。
SET SESSION sql_mode = 'ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY';
再執行方法二的SQL就被拒絕了:
SELECT
*
FROM
( SELECT * FROM `employee` ORDER BY dept, salary DESC LIMIT 1000 ) t
GROUP BY
dept
> 1055 - Expression #1 of SELECT list is not in GROUP BY clause and contains nonaggregated column 't.id' which is not functionally dependent on columns in GROUP BY clause; this is incompatible with sql_mode=only_full_group_by
> 時間: 0s
'only_full_group_by'模式下MySQL會對target list和group by column中的基礎列、表達式、別名列進行嚴格匹配。
那麼target list和group by column不匹配就一定不能執行嗎?
我們看下另外一條SQL:
# 訂單
CREATE TABLE `order` (
`order_id` int NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT COMMENT '訂單ID',
`order_amount` int NULL DEFAULT NULL COMMENT '訂單金額',
PRIMARY KEY (`order_id`) USING BTREE
) ENGINE = InnoDB CHARACTER SET = utf8 COLLATE = utf8_general_ci COMMENT = '訂單' ROW_FORMAT = DYNAMIC;
INSERT INTO `order` VALUES (1, 100);
INSERT INTO `order` VALUES (2, 103);
INSERT INTO `order` VALUES (3, 100);
# 訂單明細
CREATE TABLE `order_detail` (
`order_detail_id` int NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT COMMENT '主鍵ID',
`order_id` int NOT NULL COMMENT '訂單ID',
`goods` varchar(32) CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_general_ci NOT NULL COMMENT '商品名稱',
`goods_amount` int NOT NULL COMMENT '商品金額',
PRIMARY KEY (`order_detail_id`) USING BTREE
) ENGINE = InnoDB CHARACTER SET = utf8 COLLATE = utf8_general_ci COMMENT = '訂單明細' ROW_FORMAT = DYNAMIC;
INSERT INTO `order_detail` VALUES (1, 1, '蘋果', 10);
INSERT INTO `order_detail` VALUES (2, 1, '橙子', 20);
INSERT INTO `order_detail` VALUES (3, 1, '香蕉', 70);
INSERT INTO `order_detail` VALUES (4, 2, '橘子', 50);
INSERT INTO `order_detail` VALUES (5, 2, '菠蘿', 53);
查詢訂單中所有商品
SELECT
t1.order_id,
t1.order_amount,
GROUP_CONCAT( t2.goods, t2.goods_amount )
FROM
`order` t1
LEFT JOIN order_detail t2 ON t2.order_id = t1.order_id
GROUP BY
t1.order_id;

這條SQL的target list和group by column並不是嚴格匹配的,但是也可以執行,
注意
t1.order_id是訂單表的主鍵。
所以在'only_full_group_by'模式下,如果MySQL可以確定target list中所有列的返回值,
那麼,即使target list和group by column中的基礎列、表達式、別名列等不嚴格匹配,
MySQL也會認為它的語義是明確的,因此該條語句可以順利通過。

