协作者的智慧:绩效评估的同行评审方法（Computers and Society）
- 2020 年 1 月 6 日
- 筆記
个人在公司的表现和声誉是影响工资分配、晋升和解雇的主要因素。由于现代业务流程的复杂性和协作性，对大多数组织中个人影响的评估是一项模糊却重要的任务。现有的考绩方法往往受到个人偏见判断的影响，因此组织会对评价结果感到不满。我们认为，员工可以在复杂的协作环境中准确地衡量同事的表现。我们提出了一种新的度量方法，即同事等级评分(PRS)，它可以评估个人声誉和不可量化的个人影响。PRS是基于对员工的两两比较。我们在模拟实验中展示了该算法的高稳健性，并对一家基因测试公司进行了实证验证。
原文题目：Wisdom of collaborators: a peer-review approach to performance appraisal
原文：Individual performance and reputation within a company are major factors that influence wage distribution, promotion and firing. Due to the complexity and collaborative nature of contemporary business processes, the evaluation of individual impact in the majority of organizations is an ambiguous and non-trivial task.Existing performance appraisal approaches are often affected by individuals’ biased judgements, and organizations are dissatisfied with the results of evaluations. We assert that employees can provide accurate measurement of their peer performance in a complex collaborative environment. We propose a novel metric, the Peer Rank Score (PRS), that evaluates individual reputations and the non-quantifiable individual impact. PRS is based on pairwise comparisons of employees. We show high robustness of the algorithm on simulations and empirically validate it for a genetic testing company on more than one thousand employees using peer reviews over the course of three years.
原文作者：Sofia Dokuka, Ivan Zaikin, Kate Furman, Maksim Tsvetovat, Alex Furman
原文地址：https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.12861
