輕量級CNN模型之squeezenet

  • 2019 年 10 月 31 日
  • 筆記

SqueezeNet

論文地址:https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.07360

和別的輕量級模型一樣,模型的設計目標就是在保證精度的情況下盡量減少模型參數.核心是論文提出的一種叫"fire module"的卷積方式.

設計策略

  • 主要用1x1卷積核,而不是3x3.
  • 減少3x3卷積核作用的channel.
  • 推遲下取樣的時間.以獲取更大尺寸的feature map.這一點是處於精度的考慮.畢竟feature map的resolution越大,資訊越豐富.下取樣主要通過pool來完成或者卷積的時候控制stride大小.

Fire Module

這個就是網路的核心組件了.

分2部分:

  • squeeze convolution layer
  • expand layer
    其中squeeze只有1x1filter,expand layer由1x1和3x3filter組成.
    在squeeze層卷積核數記為(s_{1x1}),在expand層,記1x1卷積核數為(e_{1x1}),而3x3卷積核數為(e_{3x3}),這三個屬於超參數,可調。為了盡量降低3x3的輸入通道數,讓(s_{1x1}<e_{1x1}+e_{3x3})。
    這兩層的設計分別體現了策略1(多用1x1filter)和策略2(減少3x3filter作用channel).

首先,squeeze convolution layer通過控制1x1卷積核數量達到把輸入的channel數目降低的目的.這個是降低參數的最關鍵的一步.
然後,分別用1x1卷積核和3x3卷積核去做卷積.然後得到不同depth的輸出,concat起來.([x,x,depth1],[x,x,depth2]-->[x,x,depth1+depth2])

程式碼實現
torch的官方實現:https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/_modules/torchvision/models/squeezenet.html

import torch  import torch.nn as nn    class Fire(nn.Module):        def __init__(self, inplanes, squeeze_planes,                   expand1x1_planes, expand3x3_planes):          super(Fire, self).__init__()          self.inplanes = inplanes          self.squeeze = nn.Conv2d(inplanes, squeeze_planes, kernel_size=1)          self.squeeze_activation = nn.ReLU(inplace=True)          self.expand1x1 = nn.Conv2d(squeeze_planes, expand1x1_planes,                                     kernel_size=1)          self.expand1x1_activation = nn.ReLU(inplace=True)          self.expand3x3 = nn.Conv2d(squeeze_planes, expand3x3_planes,                                     kernel_size=3, padding=1)          self.expand3x3_activation = nn.ReLU(inplace=True)        def forward(self, x):          x = self.squeeze_activation(self.squeeze(x))          print(x.shape)          e_1 = self.expand1x1(x)          print(e_1.shape)          e_3 = self.expand3x3(x)          print(e_3.shape)          return torch.cat([              self.expand1x1_activation(e_1),              self.expand3x3_activation(e_3)          ], 1)

很顯然地,squeeze convolution layer把channel數量降下來了,所以參數少了很多.
以輸入tensor為[n,c,h,w]=[1,96,224,224]舉例,假設fire module的squeeze layer的卷積核數量為6,expand layer中1x1卷積核數量為5,3x3卷積核數量為4.
則fire module的參數數量為1x1x96x6 + 1x1x6x5 + 3x3x6x4=822.
普通的3x3卷積,得到depth=9的feature map的話需要3x3x96x9=7776個參數.
所以模型才可以做到很小.

網路結構


基本就是fire module的堆疊.中間穿插了一些maxpool對feature map下取樣. 注意一下最後用了dropout以及全局平均池化而不是全連接來完成分類.

最左邊的就是類似vgg的堆疊式的結構.中間和右邊的參考了resnet的skip-connection.

class SqueezeNet(nn.Module):        def __init__(self, version='1_0', num_classes=1000):          super(SqueezeNet, self).__init__()          self.num_classes = num_classes          if version == '1_0':              self.features = nn.Sequential(                  nn.Conv2d(3, 96, kernel_size=7, stride=2),                  nn.ReLU(inplace=True),                  nn.MaxPool2d(kernel_size=3, stride=2, ceil_mode=True),                  Fire(96, 16, 64, 64),                  Fire(128, 16, 64, 64),                  Fire(128, 32, 128, 128),                  nn.MaxPool2d(kernel_size=3, stride=2, ceil_mode=True),                  Fire(256, 32, 128, 128),                  Fire(256, 48, 192, 192),                  Fire(384, 48, 192, 192),                  Fire(384, 64, 256, 256),                  nn.MaxPool2d(kernel_size=3, stride=2, ceil_mode=True),                  Fire(512, 64, 256, 256),              )          elif version == '1_1':              self.features = nn.Sequential(                  nn.Conv2d(3, 64, kernel_size=3, stride=2),                  nn.ReLU(inplace=True),                  nn.MaxPool2d(kernel_size=3, stride=2, ceil_mode=True),                  Fire(64, 16, 64, 64),                  Fire(128, 16, 64, 64),                  nn.MaxPool2d(kernel_size=3, stride=2, ceil_mode=True),                  Fire(128, 32, 128, 128),                  Fire(256, 32, 128, 128),                  nn.MaxPool2d(kernel_size=3, stride=2, ceil_mode=True),                  Fire(256, 48, 192, 192),                  Fire(384, 48, 192, 192),                  Fire(384, 64, 256, 256),                  Fire(512, 64, 256, 256),              )          else:              # FIXME: Is this needed? SqueezeNet should only be called from the              # FIXME: squeezenet1_x() functions              # FIXME: This checking is not done for the other models              raise ValueError("Unsupported SqueezeNet version {version}:"                               "1_0 or 1_1 expected".format(version=version))            # Final convolution is initialized differently from the rest          final_conv = nn.Conv2d(512, self.num_classes, kernel_size=1)          self.classifier = nn.Sequential(              nn.Dropout(p=0.5),              final_conv,              nn.ReLU(inplace=True),              nn.AdaptiveAvgPool2d((1, 1))          )            for m in self.modules():              if isinstance(m, nn.Conv2d):                  if m is final_conv:                      init.normal_(m.weight, mean=0.0, std=0.01)                  else:                      init.kaiming_uniform_(m.weight)                  if m.bias is not None:                      init.constant_(m.bias, 0)        def forward(self, x):          x = self.features(x)          x = self.classifier(x)          return torch.flatten(x, 1)

https://pytorch.org/hub/pytorch_vision_squeezenet/
這裡有一個用torch中的模型做推理的例子,

.....  with torch.no_grad():      output = model(input_batch)  # Tensor of shape 1000, with confidence scores over Imagenet's 1000 classes  print(output[0])  # The output has unnormalized scores. To get probabilities, you can run a softmax on it.  print(torch.nn.functional.softmax(output[0], dim=0))

CNN結構設計的探索

主要從2個方面做實驗探討了不同結構對模型精度和模型大小的影響.

  • fire module怎麼設計,squeeze layer和expand layer的filter數量怎麼設計
  • fire module怎麼串起來形成一個網路,是簡單堆疊還是引入bypass

關於第一點fire module中各種filter佔比的實驗結果如下圖:

這裡的sr指的是squeeze layer的卷積核數量/expand layer比例.3x3filter比例指expand layer里3x3filter比例.
具體設計參考論文:

一點思考:
1x1的卷積核關聯了某個位置的feature所有channel上的資訊.3x3的卷積核關聯了多個位置的feature的所有channel的資訊.按道理說3x3的越多應該模型精度越好,但實驗數據顯示並非如此.可能有些是噪音,3x3卷積參考太多周圍的feature反而導致精度下降. 這也是深度學習現在被比較多詬病的一點,太黑盒了.只知道能work,為啥work不好解釋.不同的數據集可能不同的參數表現會不一樣,很難講哪個最優,調參比較依賴經驗.

關於第二點在layer之間採用不同的連接方式,實驗結果如下:

Tags: