snaic和tornado的简单性能测试

  • 2019 年 11 月 3 日
  • 笔记

操作系统 : CentOS7.3.1611_x64

Python 版本 : 3.6.8

tornado版本:6.0.2

snaic版本:19.9.0

CPU : Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2320 CPU @ 3.00GHz 4核

之前一直使用tornado作为http相关python程序的框架,最近查资料发现新出的snaic性能很高,这里在同样硬件条件下使用ab进行简单的压测。

准备工作

安装apache ab工具:

yum -y install httpd-tools

压测命令:

ab -c 30 -n 100000 http://127.0.0.1:9093/

参数说明:

-c :模拟并发数

-n : 总请求数

对比测试

使用tornado实现的简单http服务器代码:

https://github.com/mike-zhang/pyExamples/blob/master/httpRelate/httpServer/tornadoTest1.py

使用snaic实现的简单http服务器代码:

https://github.com/mike-zhang/pyExamples/blob/master/httpRelate/httpServer/snaicTest1.py

tornado测试结果:

Server Software:        TornadoServer/6.0.2  Server Hostname:        127.0.0.1  Server Port:            9093    Document Path:          /  Document Length:        12 bytes    Concurrency Level:      30  Time taken for tests:   82.282 seconds  Complete requests:      100000  Failed requests:        0  Write errors:           0  Total transferred:      20700000 bytes  HTML transferred:       1200000 bytes  Requests per second:    1215.33 [#/sec] (mean)  Time per request:       24.685 [ms] (mean)  Time per request:       0.823 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)  Transfer rate:          245.68 [Kbytes/sec] received    Connection Times (ms)                            min  mean[+/-sd] median   max  Connect:        0    0   0.2      0       8  Processing:     1   25  10.3     25      74  Waiting:        1   24  10.3     25      74  Total:          1   25  10.3     25      74    Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)    50%     25    66%     30    75%     33    80%     34    90%     37    95%     39    98%     41    99%     42   100%     74 (longest request)

snaic测试结果:

Server Software:  Server Hostname:        127.0.0.1  Server Port:            9093    Document Path:          /  Document Length:        12 bytes    Concurrency Level:      30  Time taken for tests:   20.164 seconds  Complete requests:      100000  Failed requests:        0  Write errors:           0  Total transferred:      11100000 bytes  HTML transferred:       1200000 bytes  Requests per second:    4959.29 [#/sec] (mean)  Time per request:       6.049 [ms] (mean)  Time per request:       0.202 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)  Transfer rate:          537.58 [Kbytes/sec] received    Connection Times (ms)                            min  mean[+/-sd] median   max  Connect:        0    2   0.5      2      11  Processing:     1    4   1.5      4      38  Waiting:        0    4   1.4      3      37  Total:          1    6   1.5      6      41    Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)    50%      6    66%      6    75%      7    80%      7    90%      7    95%      8    98%      9    99%     10   100%     41 (longest request)

从测试结果可以看到,开启两个进程情况下:

tornado的cps是 1215.33 ,平均响应时间是 24.685 ms

snaic的cps是 4959.29 ,平均响应时间是 6.049 ms

修改并发数后的测试数据如下:

 

 测试结果对比如下:

 

从测试数据来看,snaic的cps比tornado高,平均响应时间方面,snaic也比tornado短。

本文github地址:

https://github.com/mike-zhang/mikeBlogEssays/blob/master/2019/20191102_snaic和tornado的简单性能测试.rst

欢迎补充