[从源码学设计]蚂蚁金服SOFARegistry之延迟操作
- 2021 年 1 月 24 日
- 筆記
- 008_微服务, 210_SOFAStack
[从源码学设计]蚂蚁金服SOFARegistry之延迟操作
0x00 摘要
SOFARegistry 是蚂蚁金服开源的一个生产级、高时效、高可用的服务注册中心。
本系列文章重点在于分析设计和架构，即利用多篇文章，从多个角度反推总结 DataServer 或者 SOFARegistry 的实现机制和架构思路，让大家借以学习阿里如何设计。
本文为第十七篇，介绍SOFARegistry的延迟操作。
0x01 业务领域
1.1 业务缘由
为什么要有AfterWorkingProcess？
AfterWorkingProcess 的作用是延迟操作。猜测大致是因为某些情况下，无法执行业务，只能在后续时机进行弥补。
在官方博客有类似论述也支持我们的判断 ：
在数据未同步完成之前，所有对新节点的读数据操作，将转发到拥有该数据分片的数据节点。
在数据未同步完成之前，禁止对新节点的写数据操作，防止在数据同步过程中出现新的数据不一致情况。
1.2 学习方向
可以看到类似这种业务上延迟操作应该如何实现。
0x02 实现
2.1 定义
接口定义如下：
public interface AfterWorkingProcess {
void afterWorkingProcess();
int getOrder();
}
2.2 配置
这个 afterWorkProcessors 会作为 AfterWorkingProcessHandler 的成员变量进行处理。用于处理一些业务逻辑结束后的处理动作。
@Bean(name = "afterWorkProcessors")
public List<AfterWorkingProcess> afterWorkingProcessors() {
List<AfterWorkingProcess> list = new ArrayList<>();
list.add(renewDatumHandler());
list.add(datumLeaseManager());
list.add(disconnectEventHandler());
list.add(notifyDataSyncHandler());
return list;
}
@Bean
public AfterWorkingProcessHandler afterWorkingProcessHandler() {
return new AfterWorkingProcessHandler();
}
2.3 引擎
这里用法比较少见。AfterWorkingProcessHandler 也是 AfterWorkingProcess 的实现类。
在其 afterWorkingProcess 函数中，会对 Bean afterWorkingProcessors 中间注册的实现类一一调用其 afterWorkingProcess 业务函数。
其中，getOrder 会指定执行优先级，这是一个常见套路。
public class AfterWorkingProcessHandler implements AfterWorkingProcess {
@Resource(name = "afterWorkProcessors")
private List<AfterWorkingProcess> afterWorkingProcessors;
@Override
public void afterWorkingProcess() {
if(afterWorkingProcessors != null){
List<AfterWorkingProcess> list = afterWorkingProcessors.stream().sorted(Comparator.comparing(AfterWorkingProcess::getOrder)).collect(Collectors.toList());
list.forEach(AfterWorkingProcess::afterWorkingProcess);
}
}
@Override
public int getOrder() {
return 0;
}
}
2.4 调用
只有在 DataServerCache # updateDataServerStatus 函数中有调用：
afterWorkingProcessHandler.afterWorkingProcess();
而在 DataServerCache 中有如下函数都会调用到 updateDataServerStatus：
- synced
- notifiedAll
- checkAndUpdateStatus
- addNotWorkingServer
图示如下：
+------------------------------------------+
| DataServerCache | +----------------------------------------------+
| | | AfterWorkingProcess |
| synced +----------------------+ | | |
| | | +----------------------------+ | +------------------------------------------+ |
| | | | AfterWorkingProcessHandler | | |renewDatumHandler.afterWorkingProcess | |
| | | | | | | | |
| v | | | | |datumLeaseManager.afterWorkingProcess | |
| notifiedAll +--->updateDataServerStatus +------> afterWorkingProcess +------>+ | |
| ^ ^ | | | | |disconnectEventHandler.afterWorkingProcess| |
| | | | +----------------------------+ | | | |
| | | | | |notifyDataSyncHandler.afterWorkingProcess | |
| checkAndUpdateStatus+-----------+ | | | +------------------------------------------+ |
| | | +----------------------------------------------+
| addNotWorkingServer +---------------+ |
| |
+------------------------------------------+
手机如下：
因为是业务关联，所以不需要什么定时，异步之类。
2.5 业务实现
2.5.1 DisconnectEventHandler
public class DisconnectEventHandler implements InitializingBean, AfterWorkingProcess {
/**
* a DelayQueue that contains client disconnect events
*/
private final DelayQueue<DisconnectEvent> EVENT_QUEUE = new DelayQueue<>();
@Autowired
private SessionServerConnectionFactory sessionServerConnectionFactory;
@Autowired
private DataChangeEventCenter dataChangeEventCenter;
@Autowired
private DataServerConfig dataServerConfig;
@Autowired
private DataNodeStatus dataNodeStatus;
private static final int BLOCK_FOR_ALL_SYNC = 5000;
private static final BlockingQueue<DisconnectEvent> noWorkQueue = new LinkedBlockingQueue<>();
}
在receive的正常业务操作中，如果发现本身状态不是 WORKING，则把event放入 BlockingQueue 之中。
public void receive(DisconnectEvent event) {
if (event.getType() == DisconnectTypeEnum.SESSION_SERVER) {
SessionServerDisconnectEvent sessionServerDisconnectEvent = (SessionServerDisconnectEvent) event;
sessionServerDisconnectEvent.getProcessId());
} else if (event.getType() == DisconnectTypeEnum.CLIENT) {
ClientDisconnectEvent clientDisconnectEvent = (ClientDisconnectEvent) event;
}
if (dataNodeStatus.getStatus() != LocalServerStatusEnum.WORKING) {
noWorkQueue.add(event);
return;
}
EVENT_QUEUE.add(event);
}
当时机来到时候，系统再次调用afterWorkingProcess。这里会始终Block在noWorkQueue上，如果不为空，则会执行请求。
public void afterWorkingProcess() {
try {
/*
* After the snapshot data is synchronized during startup, it is queued and then placed asynchronously into
* DatumCache. When the notification becomes WORKING, there may be data in the queue that is not executed
* to DatumCache. So it need to sleep for a while.
*/
TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.sleep(BLOCK_FOR_ALL_SYNC);
while (!noWorkQueue.isEmpty()) {
DisconnectEvent event = noWorkQueue.poll(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
if (event != null) {
receive(event);
}
}
}
}
图示如下：
+----------------------------------------------------------+
| DisconnectEventHandler |
| +-------------------------+ |
| | receive | |
| | | NOT WORKING |
| | dataNodeStatus.getStatus+---------------+ |
| | + | | |
| | | WORKING | | add |
| | | | | |
| | v | | |
| | EVENT_QUEUE.add(event) | | |
| | | +---v---------+ |
| +-------------------------+ | | |
| | noWorkQueue | |
| | | |
| +-----------------------+ +-----+-------+ |
| | afterWorkingProcess | | |
| | | | poll |
| | | NOT isEmpty | |
| | receive(event) <----------------------+ |
| | | |
| | | |
| +-----------------------+ |
+----------------------------------------------------------+
2.5.2 NotifyDataSyncHandler
DisconnectEventHandler 和 NotifyDataSyncHandler 的实现类似。
依托一个 LinkedBlockingQueue 做缓存queue。
public class NotifyDataSyncHandler extends AbstractClientHandler<NotifyDataSyncRequest> implements AfterWorkingProcess {
private static final BlockingQueue<SyncDataRequestForWorking> noWorkQueue = new LinkedBlockingQueue<>();
}
在doHandle的正常业务操作中，如果发现本身状态不是 WORKING，则用业务逻辑SyncDataRequestForWorking 构建一个消息 SyncDataRequestForWorking，放入 LinkedBlockingQueue 之中。
@Override
public Object doHandle(Channel channel, NotifyDataSyncRequest request) {
final Connection connection = ((BoltChannel) channel).getConnection();
if (dataNodeStatus.getStatus() != LocalServerStatusEnum.WORKING) {
noWorkQueue.add(new SyncDataRequestForWorking(connection, request));
return CommonResponse.buildSuccessResponse();
}
executorRequest(connection, request);
return CommonResponse.buildSuccessResponse();
}
当时机来到时候，系统再次调用afterWorkingProcess。这里会始终Block在noWorkQueue上，如果不为空，则会执行请求。
@Override
public void afterWorkingProcess() {
while (!noWorkQueue.isEmpty()) {
SyncDataRequestForWorking event = noWorkQueue.poll(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
if (event != null) {
executorRequest(event.getConnection(), event.getRequest());
}
}
}
}
图示如下：
+----------------------------------------------------------+
| NotifyDataSyncHandler |
| +-------------------------+ |
| | doHandle | |
| | | NOT WORKING |
| | dataNodeStatus.getStatus+---------------+ |
| | + | | |
| | | WORKING | | add |
| | | | | |
| | v | | |
| | executorRequest | | |
| | | +---v---------+ |
| +-------------------------+ | | |
| | noWorkQueue | |
| | | |
| +-----------------------+ +-----+-------+ |
| | afterWorkingProcess | | |
| | | | poll |
| | | NOT isEmpty | |
| | executorRequest <----------------------+ |
| | | |
| | | |
| +-----------------------+ |
+----------------------------------------------------------+
2.5.3 RenewDatumHandler
RenewDatumHandler 同 DatumLeaseManager 这两者很类似。并没有使用queue，只是提交一个线程。
其实现目的在注释中写的很清楚:
/* * After the snapshot data is synchronized during startup, it is queued and then placed asynchronously into * DatumCache. When the notification becomes WORKING, there may be data in the queue that is not executed * to DatumCache. So it need to sleep for a while. */
但是细节又有所不同，这两个类是同一个作者，怀疑此君在实验比较两种不同实现方式。
RenewDatumHandler 基于 ThreadPoolExecutorDataServer 来实现。
public class RenewDatumHandler extends AbstractServerHandler<RenewDatumRequest> implements
AfterWorkingProcess {
@Autowired
private ThreadPoolExecutor renewDatumProcessorExecutor;
}
renewDatumProcessorExecutor 是一个Bean，具体代码如下，ArrayBlockingQueue:是一个基于数组结构的有界阻塞队列，按FIFO原则进行排序。
@Bean(name = "renewDatumProcessorExecutor")
public ThreadPoolExecutor renewDatumProcessorExecutor(DataServerConfig dataServerConfig) {
return new ThreadPoolExecutorDataServer("RenewDatumProcessorExecutor",
dataServerConfig.getRenewDatumExecutorMinPoolSize(),
dataServerConfig.getRenewDatumExecutorMaxPoolSize(), 300, TimeUnit.SECONDS,
new ArrayBlockingQueue<>(dataServerConfig.getRenewDatumExecutorQueueSize()),
new NamedThreadFactory("DataServer-RenewDatumProcessor-executor", true));
}
ThreadPoolExecutorDataServer 主要代码如下，就是简单继承了ThreadPoolExecutor，估计这里后续会有新功能添加，现在只是占坑：
public class ThreadPoolExecutorDataServer extends ThreadPoolExecutor {
@Override
public void execute(Runnable command) {
super.execute(command);
}
}
对于afterWorkingProcess，就是提交了一个线程，其业务是：等待一段时间，然后设置renewEnabled。
@Override
public void afterWorkingProcess() {
renewDatumProcessorExecutor.submit(() -> {
TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.sleep(dataServerConfig.getRenewEnableDelaySec());
renewEnabled.set(true);
});
}
0xFF 参考
蚂蚁金服服务注册中心如何实现 DataServer 平滑扩缩容
蚂蚁金服服务注册中心 SOFARegistry 解析 | 服务发现优化之路
服务注册中心 Session 存储策略 | SOFARegistry 解析
海量数据下的注册中心 – SOFARegistry 架构介绍
服务注册中心数据分片和同步方案详解 | SOFARegistry 解析
蚂蚁金服开源通信框架SOFABolt解析之超时控制机制及心跳机制
蚂蚁金服服务注册中心数据一致性方案分析 | SOFARegistry 解析
SOFABolt 源码分析9 – UserProcessor 自定义处理器的设计
SOFABolt 源码分析13 – Connection 事件处理机制的设计
